|
Main
Menu |
« Previous Entry (older): Subscribe to News Feed or Daily Email
» Next Entry (newer): A few words on accountability.
2859
Do Vouchers Take Money Away From Public Schools?January 10, 2006Opponents to the concept of education vouchers say that they drain money from public education. It's an interesting piece of criticism: dollars to pay for an Opportunity Scholarship voucher in Florida (recently deemed unconstitutional) were actually state funds originally slated to go to the public schools, but diverted to the private school of the parent's choice. While there are some voucher programs that are either privately-funded or federally-funded, for the most part vouchers are designed to have public school money be used to help pay for private school tuition. So yes, vouchers take money away from public schools. But is this criticism valid? A Tale of Two Districts: Let's take two hypothetical public school teachers, Joe and Guy, talking shop about school district finances. The two teach at different districts, and money is a bone of contention. This certainly is true, as the table on the right shows, Joe's district has over $33 million less in its budget. Guy doesn't accept this criticism at all, "Yes, but my district teaches more students than yours! If anything, I should be the one complaining." Which is also true. Taking into account the different sized populations, we see that in fact Joe's district spends more per pupil than Guy's. As shown above, they spend about $1400 more pupil than Guy's high-scoring district. The plan, shown above right, is to offer to 500 of the neediest students a voucher worth $4500 apiece, to be used at any private school. The voucher plan would cost about $2.2 million.
"Not so quick!" Guy counters. "Sure, it's going to take money away from your school district, but it's also taking students."As we see with the numbers crunched, after the voucher plan is enacted, the district finances have changed in two dimensions: number of pupils and total budget. The district now can spend about $300 more per-pupil. Yes, voucher programs can take money away from public schools. But they take away students at a faster rate, leaving district finances in better shape. Posted by ceb into Misconceptions
, Vouchers
TrackBack (0) | ↑ top ↑ | « previous entry | next entry » | ReformK12 home Comments
Well I just discovered this site I love it, I got inspired by watching John Stossell's (sic?) special on ABC tonight. Finally, I found a site that I could easily point out the benifits of a voucher system. It is definitely a win/win situation. Unfortunately, you've left something out of the analysis. School costs include significant fixed elements that are largely independent of student population - building costs mainly. Unless your school is teaching kids in temporary trailers, cutting the student population 4% will not likely effect these costs (capital, heating, upkeep) at all (unless it somehow allows the distict to close a school). Most overhead (principals, admin, etc) would also likely be unaffected (at least in the short term). Depends on the district of course, but I'd be willing to bet the voucher amounts are pretty close to the marginal per student cost, and thus revenue neutral (with a couple of hundred dollars). I'm pro-vouchers anyway, but mainly because I feel that the current system short-changes the consumer (parent/child), and the competitive pressure from a voucher system would provide a major force to improve this. phwest January 16, 2006 10:59 AMI always find it telling that voucher opponents are quick to notice the money leaving the budget, but not so quick to notice that the students that go with the money are also leaving. It shows where their attention really is. Wacky Hermit January 16, 2006 12:04 PMPost a comment
|