|
Main
Menu |
« Previous Entry (older): The Battle for History Standards in Minnesota
» Next Entry (newer): Cheating Pep Rally in Phoenix
1264
Deconstructing "I Am Your Public School"January 26, 2004Frosty Troy wrote a warm little essay called I Am Your Public School, published by an affiliate of the NEA, the biggest teacher union on the planet. While heartwarming and treacly, the essay appears to have not much basis in reality, but instead repeats the union party line, which insists there's nothing wrong with our public education system (other than their opinion that our teachers are underpaid and overworked, natch), so stop criticizing it already. It is so full of half-truths, innuendos, and pretzel logic that it was just begging to be fisked. Chris O'Donnell rose to the challenge, offering an impressive point-by-point deconstruction. Here we review a few key fallacies offered in I Am Your Public School: Public Schooling is 200 years old, and has given the U.S. the strongest economy on the planet. (Actually, it's less than half that age, and the twin concepts of capitalism and a free citizenry have worked wonders on the economy.) "SAT math and science test scores are at a 33 year high . . . ACT scores are up for 11 consecutive years." (We think Number 2 Pencil could set those numbers straight. But if we're doing so wonderfully, then how come our kids bomb out compared to the other industrialized nations of the world, in comparisons such as TIMSS?) Our teachers are among the "least paid among the industrial democracies of the world" (Tricky! How many industrial democracies are there in the world? But if you compare the U.S. to all the other developed nations of the world, and standardize for exchange rate, or GDP, or any economic measure you choose, you'll find American public school teachers are among the highest paid in the world.) Children fail in public schools due to lousy parenting. (Blame the parents! Yeah!) Black children fail in public schools due to single black mothers. (No comment.) "We are the only education system that educates the student to the level of his or her ability" (Unfortunately, we're not telling you that we've already pre-decided that Johnny can't read or do math, so we won't push him very hard. "Educating to the child's ability level" is edu-speak for a dumbed-down education for all.) Studies show public schools do better than charter schools or parochial schools. (Um, which studies?) "Vouchers require zero accountability." (This just in: formerly known as "parents" we shall now call them "zeros.") "I leave no child behind, but some of you would dim my lights, leaving in the shadows the poor, the halt, the blind, the lame and the special education student." (What a dystopia! It breaks our heart how critics of public education hate the poor and the lame. Pass us the tissues.) No, public education isn't universally bad, in fact there are many, many places where public schools are excellent. However the story isn't so rosy in our inner-cities, where the teacher unions rule the roost, and parents have a dearth of choices. The author of I Am Your Public School, in deflecting any and all criticisms of public schools, seeks that it stays that way. Posted by ceb into Education Reform
, Misconceptions
, Unions
| ↑ top ↑ | « previous entry | next entry » | ReformK12 home Comments
Oh - the "I am your public school" is just more drivel to justify the money spent on education in this country. In my own hometown it is obscene how much of our budget feeds the education pig.. and now the town is scrambling to widen the tax base by proposing to build a monstrous business/residential development, in order to bring in more business and residents. Targeted are older people and empty nesters to purchase condos to pay taxes(and not require much services) to further feed the education pig.. Is there any chance that technology can provide alternatives to public schooling? There are internet schools at all levels of education now, from K12 to graduate school. What are the chances that someone could put together a low cost private educational alternative, based on a commercial internet school? I understand that internet colleges and universities are gaining ground. That is good news for anyone who wants to escape the PC stranglehold the fascist professoriat exercises in higher education. RB January 27, 2004 02:40 PMWhat are the chances that someone could put together a low cost private educational alternative, based on a commercial internet school? Virtually zero. The charters and the g-schools give out "free" computers ("laptops with multimedia capability") in order to (keep the tax dollars) keep the kids in the system. Private schools just can't compete. Daryl Cobranchi January 28, 2004 05:36 AMPublic schools have been around for 200 years, but have not been mandated for that long. Your statement, as written, is incorrect. Re: "the PC stranglehold the fascist professoriat exercises in higher education." That's about as baseless a statement as I've seen lately. Michael January 28, 2004 06:58 AMGood job! The SAT score increase is not exaggerated, but I fail to see why the writer should be allowed to disregard testing in the first sentence, then claim credit for SAT rises in the second. Also, some of that rise has been accredited to the very reforms that the NEA has opposed. Kimberly January 28, 2004 09:17 PMYour comments do nothing to uplift the public school system. When are we going to place the responsibility of failing students on the parents, guardians, etc? ie Early childhood education would do an immense amount of good with children who mainly come from disfunctional homes. The investment would be returned many times over if we only had the commitment as a society. Instead we blame the schools. A great grandfather of eight soon to be ten. Don Peterson March 7, 2004 04:51 PM |